| MET ART-MET MODELS- JOY, FRESHNESS AND BEAUTY (VERY BIG PHOTO/VIDEO ARCHIVES) | ||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
| Category: | tasteful nudes | Content: | photos/videos/live chat | |||||
Members feedback: "I just found your website, and I've been looking through your archives. I just have to give it up to whoever you all are and have to say that the photographers, models, and the other people that did the shoots...GREAT JOB. I was really amazed at the artistic part of the shoots. Some of the stuff just blew my mind away. There are some really beautifull ladies on there as well. Please pass the word on. Thanks" "Review of MET Art: First Impressions: Most Erotic Teen’ site has
a nice clean, minimal look. Don’t
be deceived. These folks
have been generating high quality softcore for the site since 1999. There’s a lot here, and the decision
to leave out the whistles and bells of adult web design is actually
a blessing. Looking around a bit, it’s clear
that beautiful young models and talented photographers are the site’s
specialty. The site claims 232 movies, but the 143,639
photos are definitely what you’re paying for. Digging In: The glory is all in the details
here, so I’ll jump right into some of the site’s technical
specs before addressing the content. Rather
than annoy members with slide show features, Most Erotic Teens goes
straight for ease of access. Zipped
folders of each photo shoot are available for download in high and
low resolution formats. Further, no annoying .php scripting tricks
blocks access to the folders themselves, meaning that download managers
can be used effectively to pull maximal content in minimal time. Site browsing is easy too. MET Art magazine covers identify
every photo spread, and thumbnails load quickly. Pictures viewed in your web browser
do not open in new windows, however, making for a bit more back-buttoning
around than I like. At this point, I should probably
confess to liking the more explicit end of the single-model softcore
genre. Strip tease is great, but when full frontal
nudity is denied, I tend to lose interest. In
terms of the content at Most Erotic Teens, I found roughly half of
what I looked at to attain the level of explicitness I crave. On the whole, the photographers contributing
to the site tend to prioritize middle-distance, full-body and bust
shots. I don’t mean to say that there
isn’t an emphasis on “pink” in their palettes, only
that genital close-ups and all forms of penetration are definitely
taboo here. Given
the amount of detail in the high-resolution files (most of which are
bigger than a meg in size), I found myself completely unbothered by
the absence of “harder” content. The
site’s aesthetic seems clearly focused on presenting youthful
female beauty in all its innocence, and that’s a mission I’m
happy to support. When I find myself uninspired by
models on adult sites, I often retreat behind the argument that beauty
is in the eye of the beholder. Here
I have no reservations about recommending the site based on the looks
of its stars. There are far too many models at MET.com
to fall in love with all of them, but potential members can be confident
that they’ll find no shortage of delightful young talent suited
to their preferences. Big-breast
lovers might be advised that the site definitely favors unaltered specimens,
though. I’m tempted not to mention
the movies here at all, mostly because I can’t stop looking at
the pics. The quality and quantity of the video
offerings has improved greatly over the last year or so at MET.com,
however, making it hard not to say at least a few words. I
downloaded a sample of 8 short videos from the site to get a sense
of the range. I went straight
for the highest quality flics, which are compressed with a DivX 5 codec. The biggest of the group was 60 megs;
the smallest only 10 meg. As
I’ve said, the quality has increased dramatically in recent months. At roughly 10 meg per minute of .avi
video, the newest stuff looks very sharp. Go
back a couple years, however, and it quickly degenerates. My primary complaint with the film has
nothing to do with the resolution, though. Reviewing
my samples, I saw some good strip tease modeling performances and some
bad ones, but what bothered me throughout was less the amateur poses
than the syrupy smooth-jazz and new age soundtracks. Coupled with a number of uninspired sets
(where they’re not outdoors), the cheesy music served to taint
the whole experience for me. In
the end, next to the classiness of the photos, I just didn’t
feel that the videos measured up. Final Words: A stunning array of beautiful teen
talent and unparalleled picture quality make this one easy to recommend. No-nonsense download features and regular
updates put MET.com well beyond the bulk of softcore teen sites out
there. Fans of erotic photography will be impressed
by the list of erotic photographers contributing to the site, and high-bandwidth
collectors will marvel at the size and clarity of the images. In short, there’s little here not
to like. I found the films
considerably less sexy and less inspired than the pics, but others
may feel differently. Judged strictly on the merit of
the photography and talent base, MET.com is still a clear winner. Highest quality.
Video
Format: choice of formats and qualities Pics:
choice of (very) high-resolution and low(er)-resolution .jpegs" Reviewed by Pornliving staff |